The idea of suffering as a' call to the Other' Assignment

The idea of poor as a call to the Other - Assignment ExampleThat socio-economic class Eric Cassel published a paper on suffering based on his experience as MD. This work that first appe ard in New England Journal of treat launched a new direction in discussing suffering in healthcare setting. Lots of representatives of other disciplines used Cassels understanding of suffering in their publications to draw away attention to the fact that suffering is not related fair(a) to physical injury or some disease, but relates to human suffering as sanitary (Cassel, 1991). The core idea of Cassels perception of suffering is that the latter is experienced by persons, not merely by bodies, and has its source in challenges that threaten the intactness of a person as a complex social and psychologic entity (Cassel, 1982, p. 639). Moreover, the author expresses the view that suffering can include paroxysm, yet is not restricted to it. Importantly, he asserts that to discharge human suffering is the obligation of the medical care. Cassels comparisons and studies in the area of pain and human suffering, as well as his thoughts on message are compatible with the themes of nursing and medical care explored in history. However, in practice one can find that despite their historic meaning, both medicine and nursing often fail to carry out this important duty within modern healthcare. Instead, they have become over technical and depersonalized. To our exploration of suffering as a Call to the Other, Cassels study of the illness and its meaning seems specifically relevant since it can be well applied to the nursing practice. Cassel thinks of personal meaning as a basic and principal dimension of what we know as personhood. To add, Cassel provides explanation of the importance of recognition of personal meaning. In particular, the researcher states that this recognition is life-and-death in understanding peoples illnesses and sufferings. Finally, Cassel rebukes current medic ine for its ignorance of persons spirit that drives human life, or in other words for its harm to include the transcendent dimension. ORIGINS OF SUFFERING In his study Medicine and Human Suffering, Professor Hiram Caton asserts that the origin of suffering within humans is their anxiety of death. He writes, The fundamental human suffering is knowledge of mortality (Caton, 1998). However, the vision of origins of suffering is far more complex. Suffering is classified as physical and psychological. For instance, Tudor speaks of physical, psychological suffering, and affliction. Recognizing the existing dichotomy between mind and body, Tudor defines physical suffering as suffering felt as physical pain and psychological suffering as suffering felt as psychological pain (Tudor, 2001 23). In relation to psychological suffering, the term of affliction has been successfully developed by Weil. In his interpretation, suffering is perceived as affliction and it involves a combination of psyc hological distress, pain felt physically, and some social elements. In addition, psychological suffering is as well known as sorrow, which seems to be unable to accurately reflect such states as distress, despair, anguish, shock, etc (Wyschgorod, 1990 34). Psychological and physical suffering differ not just in the nature of pain that the Other experiences, but in terms of expressibility as well. On the basis of careful observation, Scarry has come to the conclusion that Physical pain does not simply resist language but actively destroys it, bringing